On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:24:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:28:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > + if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && prev->state != TASK_DEAD)) { > > > __schedule_bug(prev); > > > + preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED); > > > > That one would be a bit fragile if we kept PREEMPT_ACTIVE, but since we are > > removing > > it... > > Right, let me move this patch after 7 (the one that stops setting > PREEMPT_ACTIVE).
Perfect! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/