Hello.
On 9/29/2015 6:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
NAK on the same grounds as the 3.10 patch.
------------------
From: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com>
commit dfc50fcaad574e5c8c85cbc83eca1426b2413fa4 upstream.
Current check of phydev with IS_ERR(phydev) may make not much sense
because of_phy_connect() returns NULL on failure instead of error value.
Still for checking result of phy_connect() IS_ERR() makes perfect sense.
So let's use combined check IS_ERR_OR_NULL() that covers both cases.
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavall...@st.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrod...@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -810,8 +810,11 @@ static int stmmac_init_phy(struct net_de
phydev = phy_connect(dev, phy_id_fmt, &stmmac_adjust_link, interface);
If you really read the change log and compare it with the code, it's
obviousl that the patch is not needed.
- if (IS_ERR(phydev)) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phydev)) {
pr_err("%s: Could not attach to PHY\n", dev->name);
+ if (!phydev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
return PTR_ERR(phydev);
}
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
