On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> wrote:
> To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
> the devm_ memory allocation calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
> ---
> net/dsa/dsa.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index c59fa5d..98f94c2 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_setup_one(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> struct device *parent)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
>
> - ds->slave_mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
> + ds->slave_mii_bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc(parent);
> if (ds->slave_mii_bus == NULL) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, int index,
> /*
> * Allocate and initialise switch state.
> */
> - ds = kzalloc(sizeof(*ds) + drv->priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + ds = devm_kzalloc(parent, sizeof(*ds) + drv->priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Shouldn't devm_ functions be called only from probe and remove functions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
