On 10/01/2015 06:32 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 09/30/2015 10:21 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and >>> exit the dsa_probe cleanly. > > ... > >> Couldn't we use the probe defer mechanism here ? (until complete rework is >> done) > > Hi Neil > > I was thinking the same last night. We know the switch should be > there, otherwise it would not be in DT. So returning -EPROBE_DEFER > would be valid. > > Andrew > Hi,
It makes sens but does a module insertion triggers the differed probe ? I will still post this change in a next set of patch. Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
