On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:32:12PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:58:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > It would be good if somewhere early on in these mails the report said if > > the build failed - that's key information about how urgent issues are > > and it's not always clear if things are errors or warnings. > When the robot say "All error/warnings" it has build failure (and > possibly warnings). If there are only build warnings it'll say > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): Ah, I see - it's more clear in the warnings only case, it's less obvious in the errors case that this message would be different if there were only warnings. > Would you like making that line more clear, or show the info > earlier in the email body or even email title? For example, > the first line could be changed to > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > ignore] > [auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please > ignore] > depending on whether it has build failure or just warnings. That would be excellent, yes.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
