* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Do you have any more objections to these patches? Would you be willing
> to apply them?
So I still don't like the tool namespace you picked: Git-alike generic naming
plus
subcommands work so much better that I'm not sure why we are even having that
discussion: if you name your tool 'stacktool' and alias everything you have
today
to under 'stacktool run ...' and add 'stacktool help' as a second, obvious
subcommand then you'll have your current syntax and a lot more future
flexibility
and ability to branch off various functionality a'la Git, perf or kvmtool ...
It's an 100% equivalent superset of your current stacktool's parameter
structure,
so none of your prior objections apply.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
