* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Do you have any more objections to these patches? Would you be willing > to apply them?
So I still don't like the tool namespace you picked: Git-alike generic naming plus subcommands work so much better that I'm not sure why we are even having that discussion: if you name your tool 'stacktool' and alias everything you have today to under 'stacktool run ...' and add 'stacktool help' as a second, obvious subcommand then you'll have your current syntax and a lot more future flexibility and ability to branch off various functionality a'la Git, perf or kvmtool ... It's an 100% equivalent superset of your current stacktool's parameter structure, so none of your prior objections apply. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/