Dne 01. 09. 20 v 0:37 David Teigland napsal(a):
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:49:38PM +0800, heming.z...@suse.com wrote:
in my opinion, the 'not available'
We already use the word available/unavailable in other ways, so let's use
"broken" for the moment, maybe we can find a better word.
'lvs -o broken' would report 0|1. Choosing an attr letter to represent
that is not as important and can be decided on later.
I'd probably pick the 'opposite' word - i.e. lvs -o lv_usable -
but ATM - I'm still no sure how the meaning would differ from 'partial'
(which seems like it"s still missing separate lvs attribute shown only through
health attr column 9 letter).
But we probably need to look much deeper look at the meaning of partial -
which ATM is a simply transitivity enclosure over LV stack - while
particularly in raid case we need to probably go deeper and device into
categories.
This would also greatly help the current activation logic as well - but we
probably need to first acknowledge what is 'preferred' view from md raid side
- as these do not have an exact match.
Zdenek
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
