On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:09:23PM +0800, heming.zhao wrote: > 'broken' is acceptable and good word. > I'm only afraid end user don't know there is a new string item for lvs. > like me, I just know the lv_health_status string item from Zdenek's mail. > (sorry for my stupid)
I also like Zdenek's "usable", which seems to be closer to what we mean. In addition to the reporting field can could be a new letter in the 9th lv attr field. (We'd have to figure out the priority of this letter vs the others.) > I prefer lvm report status from the entire LV side. > lvm provides virtual blocks to upper layer softwares, most of softwares use > whole virtual disk. Limit this to what lvm knows already. The field will represent whether lvm believes the uppser layer can successfully do io to the entire LV. Dave _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
