----- Original Message ----- From: "Devin Heitmueller" <dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com> To: "Britney Fransen" <britney.fran...@gmail.com> Cc: "Devin Heitmueller" <devin.heitmuel...@gmail.com>; "Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:56 PM Subject: Re: XC5000 improvements: call for testers!
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Britney Fransen > <britney.fran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I finally had some time to do some more testing with the beta2 tree and I > > think most of the issues I had were user error. Not exactly sure what I did > > wrong before but I am not seeing the reception issues or any regressions on > > the digital side anymore. I think why I thought I was seeing QAM64 was > > because I was using the wrong tuner. With the beta2 tree my 950q is now > > adapter1, before it was always adapter2. That could be part of what I > > thought was the reception regression as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Britney > > Hello Britney, > > Thank you for taking the time to isolate/debug the situation. The > changes should have no effect on the order of adapter1/adapter2. > Could have just been a coincidence or the order in which you plugged > in the devices compared to what they usually are at boot time. > > Glad to see that there are no longer any issues. Once I get one > outstanding Pinnacle 800i fix in, I will issue a PULL request and this > will go into the mainline. > > Cheers, > > Devin > > -- > Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs > http://www.kernellabs.com So when this goes main, next time we update from v4l we need the new firmware right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
