On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> 
> Dear Guennadi
> 
> Thank you for checking patch
> 
> > +   ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, OUTCTR1,
> > +                                   VSP_LO | VSSL_VVALID |
> > +                                   HSP_LO | HSSL_DVALID);
> > 
> > now you dropped VSP_LO | HSP_LO, could you, please, explain, why? Also, 
> > sorry for not explaining properly. Yesterday I wrote
> 
> Because VSP_LO = HSP_LO = 0.

Oh, indeed. Ok, but can you add proper support for both high and low 
polarities?

> And when I use xVALID, xSP_LO mean ACTIVE HI.
> 
> So, I drop these explain because it is just un-understandable.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to