Hi Laurent, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 01:48:27PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Friday, 15 September 2017 17:17:00 EEST Sakari Ailus wrote: > > In V4L2 the practice is to have the KernelDoc documentation in the header > > and not in .c source code files. This consequently makes the V4L2 fwnode > > function documentation part of the Media documentation build. > > > > Also correct the link related function and argument naming in > > documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se> > > Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com> > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> > > I'm still very opposed to this. In addition to increasing the risk of > documentation becoming stale, it also makes review more difficult. I'm > reviewing patch 05/25 of this series and I have to jump around the patch to > verify that the documentation matches the implementation, it's really > annoying.
I'd like to have this discussion separately from the patchset, which is right now in its 13th version. This patch simply makes the current state consistent; V4L2 async was the only part of V4L2 with KernelDoc documentation in .c files. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ai...@iki.fi
