Em 17-10-2010 20:03, Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu: > Hi Mauro > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> == Soc_camera waiting for Guennadi Liakhovetski >> <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de> review == >> >> (Guennadi gave me an update about those patches last time. I'm not sure >> about the updated status) >> >> Jul, 5 2010: soc-camera: module_put() fix >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/110202 Magnus Damm >> <d...@opensource.se> > > Please, mark as dropped > >> Jul,27 2010: [1/4] mx2_camera: fix a race causing NULL dereference >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114515 Baruch Siach >> <bar...@tkos.co.il> > > is upstream > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5384a12b23160e11ff949a94172051476d308b66 > >> Jul,27 2010: [2/4] mx2_camera: return IRQ_NONE when doing nothing >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114517 Baruch Siach >> <bar...@tkos.co.il> > > mark as dropped > >> Jul,27 2010: [4/4] mx2_camera: implement forced termination of active buffer >> for mx http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114518 Baruch Siach >> <bar...@tkos.co.il> > > is in next > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=9cf6ddf5eeedaffd989f9b93df1b7ea8d459786b > >> Aug, 3 2010: [2/5] mx2_camera: remove emma limitation for RGB565 >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116703 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > is in next > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=2b262a18b79768a2b7a62ba187f8830802790b9a > >> Aug, 3 2010: [3/5] mx2_camera: fix for list bufnum in frame_done_emma >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116705 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > is upstream > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cd9ebdbc0541b4e8ee145c81642d68332f79b932 > >> Aug, 3 2010: [4/5] mx2_camera: add rising edge for pixclock >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116704 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > upstream > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d86097e19cef2f13a29fc37db0dad17b99b6d5f8 > >> Aug, 3 2010: [5/5] mx2_camera: add informative camera clock frequency >> printout http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116707 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > in next > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=e7d317b5b210a2f9486faa335e4eff81e5f6210d > >> Aug, 3 2010: [04/11] mt9m111: added new bit offset defines >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116721 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > waiting an update (possible merge with 08/11 and 10/11 below) > >> Aug, 3 2010: [06/11] mt9m111: cropcap and s_crop check if type is >> VIDEO_CAPTURE http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116726 Michael >> Grzeschik <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > upstream > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6b6d33c746ace7bd0dbbdde674d3fb1100ab081d > >> Aug, 3 2010: [07/11] mt9m111: added current colorspace at g_fmt >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116724 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > upstream > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=01f5a394eac48b74c84434e95e74cd172b0682c3 > >> Aug, 3 2010: [08/11] mt9m111: added reg_mask function >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116722 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > waiting for update (see 04/11 above) > >> Aug, 3 2010: [v2,10/11] mt9m111: rewrite set_pixfmt >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116728 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > waiting for update (see 04/11 above) > >> Aug, 3 2010: [v2,11/11] mt9m111: make use of testpattern >> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116730 Michael Grzeschik >> <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de> > > waiting for a new version, using additional inputs to provide test > patterns.
Updated, thanks! > > Somehow, looks like patches, that I push to you, don't (automatically) get > updated in patchwork, is there anything, that I'm doing wrongly, why this > is happening? Unfortunately, they're not updated automatically. There's no easy way to discover when a patch at a pull request were also sent to the ML. I need to do it manually. In fact, there's an easy way to allow me to automatically update the patchwork ID. All you need is to add: X-Patchwork-Id: <ID> in the body of the email. My scripts use this tag to mark a patch as accepted/rejected when I accept/reject a patch, as this tag is generated by patchwork. Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
