On Apr 8, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Lawrence Rust wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:21 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:41 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >>>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Lawrence Rust wrote: >>>> >>>>> This patch restores remote control input for cx2388x based boards on >>>>> Linux kernels >= 2.6.38. >>>>> >>>>> After upgrading from Linux 2.6.37 to 2.6.38 I found that the remote >>>>> control input of my Hauppauge Nova-S plus was no longer functioning. >>>>> I posted a question on this newsgroup and Mauro Carvalho Chehab gave >>>>> some helpful pointers as to the likely cause. >>>>> >>>>> Turns out that there are 2 problems: >>>> ... >>>>> 2. The RC5 decoder appends the system code to the scancode and passes >>>>> the combination to rc_keydown(). Unfortunately, the combined value is >>>>> then forwarded to input_event() which then fails to recognise a valid >>>>> scancode and hence no input events are generated. >>>> >>>> Just to clarify on this one, you're missing a step. We get the scancode, >>>> and its passed to rc_keydown. rc_keydown then looks for a match in the >>>> loaded keytable, then passes the *keycode* that matches the scancode >>>> along to input_event. If you fix the keytable to contain system and >>>> command, everything should work just fine again. Throwing away data is >>>> a no-no though -- take a look at recent changes to ir-kdb-i2c, which >>>> actually just recently made it start *including* system. :) >>> >>> Don't shoot the messenger. >> >> Wasn't my intention. I was simply trying to explain why your "fix" >> isn't correct. >> >> >>> I'm just reporting what I had to do to fix a clumsy hack by someone 6 >>> months ago who didn't test their changes. This patch _restores_ the >>> operation of a subsystem broken by those changes >>> >>> Perhaps those responsible for commit >>> 2997137be8eba5bf9c07a24d5fda1f4225f9ca7d: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <da...@hardeman.nu> >>> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com> >>> >>> should fix the keytable. In the meantime (next year) I'll be using this >>> patch. >> >> The entire commit message: >> >> [media] ir-core: convert drivers/media/video/cx88 to ir-core >> >> This patch converts the cx88 driver (for sampling hw) to use the >> decoders provided by ir-core instead of the separate ones provided >> by ir-functions (and gets rid of those). >> >> The value for MO_DDS_IO had a comment saying it corresponded to >> a 4kHz samplerate. That comment was unfortunately misleading. The >> actual samplerate was something like 3250Hz. >> >> The current value has been derived by analyzing the elapsed time >> between interrupts for different values (knowing that each interrupt >> corresponds to 32 samples). >> >> Thanks to Mariusz Bialonczyk <ma...@skyboo.net> for testing my patches >> (about one a day for two weeks!) on actual hardware. >> >> Please note the part about how it *was* tested. And this certainly >> was not a "clumsy hack", I'd actually call it a fairly skilled bit >> of code de-duplication by David. Anyway... >> >> The problem is that there isn't a "the keytable". There are many >> many keytables. And a lot of different hardware. Testing all possible >> combinations of hardware (both receiver side and remote side) is >> next to impossible. > > Hauppauge have the lion's share of the DVB card market so this mod > should have been tested with a Haupauge RC, but clearly wasn't.
Its actually not that clear. It clearly wasn't tested with *your* receiver hardware, but a Hauppauge RC *was* tested using other receiver hardware, most notably, ir-kbd-i2c-driven IR hardware in the PVR-250, HVR-1950 and HD-PVR. Umpteen different combinations of bridge drivers, demod drivers, IR chips, etc., make it rather hard to test every possible combination, even when looking solely at products from a single company. :\ > It also > clearly wasn't tested with a cx2388x card because the interrupt handler > has an obvious overflow. I'll give you that one. But look how many different devices are listed in cx88_ir_init(), and you can see how it might be hard to be able to test every single combination. >> We do what we can. Its unfortunate that your >> hardware regressed in functionality. It happens, but it *can* be >> fixed. The fix you provided just wasn't correct. > > It is correct for 2.6.38, which is what was described. I haven't > checked all the keymaps but a sample of 5 show that none include a > system ID. Likely because they're primarily used by non-raw IR drivers and/or ir-kbd-i2c, which until 2.6.39, was stripping out system codes (which made it impossible to use a universal remote programmed for rc-5 signals that aren't using Hauppauge's system codes of choice, despite it being entirely possible for the hardware to handle it). >> The correct fix is >> trivially updating drivers/media/rc/keymaps/<insert-your-keymap-here>. > > So, cherrypick the Hauppauge keytable from 2.6.39 and apply it to 2.6.38 > together with the 2nd part of this patch. It would be real nice if that > was in 2.6.38.3 See my reply to Devin's mail, re: ir-kbd-i2c. We're sort of in a crappy situation here. Changing the keymaps to include system code in 2.6.38 means breaking every other Hauppauge card that uses ir-kbd-i2c, unless that *also* gets updated in 2.6.38. I'm fairly certain that Hauppauge hardware with ir-kbd-i2c-driven IR is actually more common in the field than that which actually passes raw IR. However, I think by simply adding a temporarily redundant keymap that gets used by raw IR hardware, or by increasing the size of the single Hauppauge keymap by way of multiple mappings for each key (both with and without system codes), we can satisfy both cases in 2.6.38. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
