Hi Kalle,

On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:51:56 kalle.jokini...@nokia.com wrote:
> On 3. toukokuuta 2011 13:49 Laurent Pinchart wrote: 
> > On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:41:23 Kalle Jokiniemi wrote:
> > > The RX-51 uses the CSIb IO complex for camera operation. The
> > > board file is missing definition for the regulator supplying
> > > the CSIb complex, so this is added for better power
> > > management.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokini...@nokia.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c |    6 ++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c index bbcb677..2f12425
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> > > @@ -337,6 +337,10 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] __initdata =
> > 
> > {
> > 
> > >  static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vmmc1_supply =
> > >  
> > >   REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vmmc", "omap_hsmmc.0");
> > > 
> > > +static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vaux2_supply[] = {
> > > + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_csib", "omap3isp"),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > 
> > What about
> > 
> > static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vaux2_supply =
> > 
> >     REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_csib", "omap3isp");
> > 
> > instead ? :-) It would be in line with the other vaux supply
> > definitions.
> > 
> > >  static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vaux3_supply =
> > >  
> > >   REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vmmc", "omap_hsmmc.1");
> > > 
> > > @@ -400,6 +404,8 @@ static struct regulator_init_data rx51_vaux2 = {
> > > 
> > >           .valid_ops_mask         = REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE
> > >           
> > >                                   | REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS,
> > >   
> > >   },
> > > 
> > > + .num_consumer_supplies  = 1,
> > > + .consumer_supplies      = rx51_vaux2_supply,
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > .consumer_supplies  = &rx51_vaux2_supply,
> > 
> > here.
> > 
> > If you're fine with that, there's no need to resubmit, I'll modify this
> > patch and push the set through my tree (let me know if I can keep your
> > SoB line with that change).
> 
> Perfectly fine with me, you can keep the SoB line.

I've picked the patches up. I'll submit them for 2.6.40.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to