On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:09:14PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Jon Arne Jørgensen wrote:
> > As we're now seeing other variants from chinese clones, like
> > gm1113c, we'll need to add more bits at the detection code.
> >
> > So, move it into a separate function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Arne Jørgensen <jona...@jonarne.no>
>
> As far as I can see, this patch is identical to the one sent
> by Mauro. Therefore, your SOB here is incorrect, since you are not
> the author of the patch.
>
> The proper way of re-submitting patches that have been previously
> submitted by another developer is this:
>
> --
> From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com>
>
> Commit message goes here.
>
> Notice how the first line is a 'From:' tagcindicating who's the
> real submitter. The SOB tag indicates the patch author, and you
> can add your acked-by, tested-by or reported-by if you want.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Jon Arne Jørgensen <jona...@jonarne.no>
> --
>
> You can read more about this in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
I just re-read SubmittingPatches.
I couldn't see that there is anything wrong with multiple sign-off's.
Quote:
The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery
path.
and:
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
It's not that important to me, so If you insist, I'll remove the
signed-off-by line :)
> --
> Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
