Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 29 May 2014 17:40:48 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add support for the V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN control. When the solid colour
> mode is selected, additional controls become available for setting the
> solid four solid colour components.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c
> b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c index 446c82c..dc82adb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,16 @@ static void smiapp_update_mbus_formats(struct
> smiapp_sensor *sensor) pixel_order_str[pixel_order]);
> }
>
> +static const char * const smiapp_test_patterns[] = {
> + "Disabled",
> + "Solid Colour",
> + "Eight Vertical Colour Bars",
> + "Colour Bars With Fade to Grey",
> + "Pseudorandom Sequence (PN9)",
> +};
> +
> +static const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops smiapp_ctrl_ops;
Is this needed ?
> +
> static int smiapp_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> struct smiapp_sensor *sensor =
> @@ -477,6 +487,35 @@ static int smiapp_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>
> return smiapp_pll_update(sensor);
>
> + case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN: {
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sensor->test_data); i++)
> + v4l2_ctrl_activate(
> + sensor->test_data[i],
> + ctrl->val ==
> + V4L2_SMIAPP_TEST_PATTERN_MODE_SOLID_COLOUR);
> +
> + return smiapp_write(
> + sensor, SMIAPP_REG_U16_TEST_PATTERN_MODE, ctrl->val);
> + }
> +
> + case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_RED:
> + return smiapp_write(
> + sensor, SMIAPP_REG_U16_TEST_DATA_RED, ctrl->val);
> +
> + case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_GREENR:
> + return smiapp_write(
> + sensor, SMIAPP_REG_U16_TEST_DATA_GREENR, ctrl->val);
> +
> + case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_BLUE:
> + return smiapp_write(
> + sensor, SMIAPP_REG_U16_TEST_DATA_BLUE, ctrl->val);
> +
> + case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_GREENB:
> + return smiapp_write(
> + sensor, SMIAPP_REG_U16_TEST_DATA_GREENB, ctrl->val);
> +
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -489,10 +528,10 @@ static const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops smiapp_ctrl_ops = {
> static int smiapp_init_controls(struct smiapp_sensor *sensor)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&sensor->src->sd);
> - unsigned int max;
> + unsigned int max, i;
> int rval;
>
> - rval = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler, 7);
> + rval = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler, 12);
> if (rval)
> return rval;
> sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler.lock = &sensor->mutex;
> @@ -535,6 +574,18 @@ static int smiapp_init_controls(struct smiapp_sensor
> *sensor) &sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler, &smiapp_ctrl_ops,
> V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE, 0, 0, 1, 0);
>
> + v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items(&sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler,
> + &smiapp_ctrl_ops, V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(smiapp_test_patterns) - 1,
> + 0, 0, smiapp_test_patterns);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sensor->test_data); i++)
> + sensor->test_data[i] =
> + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler,
> + &smiapp_ctrl_ops,
> + V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN_RED + i,
> + 0, 0, 1, 0);
> +
> if (sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler.error) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> "pixel array controls initialization failed (%d)\n",
> @@ -543,6 +594,14 @@ static int smiapp_init_controls(struct smiapp_sensor
> *sensor) goto error;
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sensor->test_data); i++) {
> + struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl = sensor->test_data[i];
> +
> + ctrl->maximum =
> + ctrl->default_value =
> + ctrl->cur.val = (1 << sensor->csi_format->width) - 1;
I think multiple assignments on the same line are discouraged.
Furthermore, couldn't you move this above and use the right values directly
when creating the controls ?
> + }
> +
> sensor->pixel_array->sd.ctrl_handler =
> &sensor->pixel_array->ctrl_handler;
>
> @@ -1670,17 +1729,34 @@ static int smiapp_set_format(struct v4l2_subdev
> *subdev, if (fmt->pad == ssd->source_pad) {
> u32 code = fmt->format.code;
> int rval = __smiapp_get_format(subdev, fh, fmt);
> + bool range_changed = false;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> if (!rval && subdev == &sensor->src->sd) {
> const struct smiapp_csi_data_format *csi_format =
> smiapp_validate_csi_data_format(sensor, code);
> - if (fmt->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE)
> +
> + if (fmt->which == V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE) {
> + if (csi_format->width !=
> + sensor->csi_format->width)
> + range_changed = true;
> +
> sensor->csi_format = csi_format;
> + }
> +
> fmt->format.code = csi_format->code;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&sensor->mutex);
> - return rval;
> + if (rval || !range_changed)
> + return rval;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sensor->test_data); i++)
> + v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(
> + sensor->test_data[i],
> + 0, (1 << sensor->csi_format->width) - 1, 1, 0);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Sink pad. Width and height are changeable here. */
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h
> b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h index 7cc5aae..874b49f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@
> (1000 + (SMIAPP_RESET_DELAY_CLOCKS * 1000 \
> + (clk) / 1000 - 1) / ((clk) / 1000))
>
> +#define SMIAPP_COLOUR_COMPONENTS 4
> +
> #include "smiapp-limits.h"
>
> struct smiapp_quirk;
> @@ -241,6 +243,8 @@ struct smiapp_sensor {
> /* src controls */
> struct v4l2_ctrl *link_freq;
> struct v4l2_ctrl *pixel_rate_csi;
> + /* test pattern colour components */
> + struct v4l2_ctrl *test_data[SMIAPP_COLOUR_COMPONENTS];
> };
>
> #define to_smiapp_subdev(_sd) \
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
