On 10/16/2015 10:59 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/2015 11:53 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 12:06 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Hi Antti,
>>>
>>> Two comments, see below:
>>>
>>> On 09/01/2015 11:59 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
>>>> HackRF SDR device has both receiver and transmitter. There is limitation
>>>> that receiver and transmitter cannot be used at the same time
>>>> (half-duplex operation). That patch implements transmitter support to
>>>> existing receiver only driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <cr...@iki.fi>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c | 923
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 648 insertions(+), 275 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
>>>> b/drivers/media/usb/hackrf/hackrf.c
>>>> -static unsigned int hackrf_convert_stream(struct hackrf_dev *dev,
>>>> - void *dst, void *src, unsigned int src_len)
>>>> +void hackrf_copy_stream(struct hackrf_dev *dev, void *dst,
>>>
>>> Is there any reason 'static' was removed here? It's not used externally as
>>> far as I can tell.
>>>
>>>> + void *src, unsigned int src_len)
>>>> {
>>>> memcpy(dst, src, src_len);
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> +static int hackrf_s_modulator(struct file *file, void *fh,
>>>> + const struct v4l2_modulator *a)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct hackrf_dev *dev = video_drvdata(file);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "index=%d\n", a->index);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (a->index == 0)
>>>> + ret = 0;
>>>> + else if (a->index == 1)
>>>> + ret = 0;
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Why implement this at all? It's not doing anything. I'd just drop
>>> s_modulator
>>> support.
>>>
>>> If there is a reason why you do need it, then simplify it to:
>>>
>>> return a->index > 1 ? -EINVAL : 0;
>>
>> Oops, I was wrong. You need this regardless for the simple reason that the
>> spec
>> mandates it. And indeed without s_modulator v4l2-compliance will fail.
>>
>> I've put back this function, but replacing the index check with the
>> one-liner I
>> suggested above.
>>
>> I'm merging this hackrf patch series with that change and a small fix for the
>> krobot 'unused intf' warning, so you don't need to do anything.
>>
>> Thanks for doing this work!
>
> OK, good! Update also documentation changelog / history kernel version
> number to one which is correct (~4.0 => 4.4).
Done!
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
