On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:46:50PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is a RFC patch that support clock-gating for saving power consumption.
> I found mmc_host_enable/mmc_host_disable function in core.c
> (using MMC_CAP_DSIABLE. i think that use when host enable/disable)
> So, i used that functions and implemented some functions in sdhci-s3c.c &
> sdhci.c
>
> i want any feedback. how do you think about this patch?
> Plz let me know...
>
> Thank you all
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 401527d..fa2e55d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1245,7 +1245,37 @@ out:
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static int sdhci_enable_clk(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (host->old_clock != 0 && host->clock == 0) {
> + if (host->ops->enable)
> + ret = host->ops->enable(host);
> + sdhci_set_clock(host, host->old_clock);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdhci_disable_clk(struct mmc_host *mmc, int lazy)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (host->clock != 0) {
> + host->old_clock = host->clock;
> + sdhci_set_clock(host, 0);
> + if (host->ops->disable)
> + ret = host->ops->disable(host, lazy);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static const struct mmc_host_ops sdhci_ops = {
> + .enable = sdhci_enable_clk,
> + .disable = sdhci_disable_clk,
> .request = sdhci_request,
> .set_ios = sdhci_set_ios,
> .get_ro = sdhci_get_ro,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index d316bc7..0c6f143 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> unsigned int timeout_clk; /* Timeout freq (KHz) */
>
> unsigned int clock; /* Current clock (MHz) */
> + unsigned int old_clock; /* Old clock (MHz) */
> + unsigned int clk_cnt; /* Clock user count */
> u8 pwr; /* Current voltage */
>
> struct mmc_request *mrq; /* Current request */
> @@ -323,6 +325,8 @@ struct sdhci_ops {
> unsigned int (*get_max_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_min_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> unsigned int (*get_timeout_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> + int (*enable)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> + int (*disable)(struct sdhci_host *host, int lazy);
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
I could have misunderstood something, but do you really need this new
'old_clock' member? Is the previous clock value not stored in
host->ios.clock?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
