On Friday 14 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S
> <girish.shivananja...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> Hi Girish,
> >>
> >> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
> >> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
> >> Unfortunate I don't have such a device available right now. What I did
> >> test was that patch must not break anything and tested that the
> >> suspend/resume sequence is fixed for eMMC with sleep support. I also
> >> tested this with MMC_CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY enabled.
> >>
> >> Are you able to help out in testing with a eMMC 4.5 device with
> >> POWER_OFF_NOTIFY support?
> >
> > I am also facing the same problem. The board that i used earlier to
> > upstream 4.5 patches is not functioning. Thats the reason for the
> > delay in upstreaming or sending the patch. Once i get it repaired i ll
> > definitely do it.
> > It would be helpful if somebody in the list can do this in the mean time.
>
> Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5
> board so maybe he can test it?
I have a few eMMC samples but am only using them with my (slow) thinkpad
SD card reader. I also don't know which eMMC-4.5 features they implement,
as some may be early prototypes.
What exactly do you need tested?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
