On 14 September 2012 20:34, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Girish K S
>> <girish.shivananja...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On 14 September 2012 12:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> Hi Girish,
>> >>
>> >> I should also have stated that this patch has not been tested with an
>> >> eMMC 4.5 device, thus the power off notification is not fully tested.
>> >> Unfortunate I don't have such a device available right now. What I did
>> >> test was that patch must not break anything and tested that the
>> >> suspend/resume sequence is fixed for eMMC with sleep support. I also
>> >> tested this with MMC_CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY enabled.
>> >>
>> >> Are you able to help out in testing with a eMMC 4.5 device with
>> >> POWER_OFF_NOTIFY support?
>> >
>> > I am also facing the same problem. The board that i used earlier to
>> > upstream 4.5 patches is not functioning. Thats the reason for the
>> > delay in upstreaming or sending the patch. Once i get it repaired i ll
>> > definitely do it.
>> > It would be helpful if somebody in the list can do this in the mean time.
>>
>> Let's page Arnd, I was under the impression that he has a eMMC 4.5
>> board so maybe he can test it?
>
> I have a few eMMC samples but am only using them with my (slow) thinkpad
> SD card reader. I also don't know which eMMC-4.5 features they implement,
> as some may be early prototypes.
>
> What exactly do you need tested?
Poweroff Notify feature with the above patch in suspend to ram.
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
