On Monday 14 September 2015 04:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:45:43PM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
Came across below lines in the datasheet,

========= Copy-n-paste from datasheet============

All SDH interfaces share the same clock which is enabled when any of the SDH
clock enables are
set (from PMUA_SDH1_CLK_RES_CTRL, PMUA_SDH2_CLK_RES_CTRL,
PMUA_SDH3_CLK_RES_CTRL, PMUA_SDH4_CLK_RES_CTRL,
PMUA_SDH5_CLK_RES_CTRL), with clock source select and divider ratio
controlled by
PMUA_SDH1_CLK_RES_CTRL.

==================================================


And I can confirm that after disabling AXI interface clock for all the
SDH modules (1-5) I see I get an abort.

This clearly explains/justifies/proves that the existing code is
working as expected. I have eMMC mounted on the board, which makes
clock to always stay ON on SDH3.

So there is an OR gate implemented inside which takes input from
SDHx_AXI_EN and feeds back to all SDHx instances. Don't ask me why it
has been designed that way :)

And I did some experiment as well, so what I have observed is,
SDH_AXI_CLOCK is required to generate card detection, without that I do
not see card detection working.

What that means is that if DT configures the interface to use its
internal card detection, the AXI clock must never shut off when entering
runtime-PM.


Yes, exactly.
Its clock driver which is doing this.

static struct mmp_param_gate_clk apmu_gate_clks[] = {
        /* The gate clocks has mux parent. */
{PXA1928_CLK_SDH0, "sdh0_clk", "sdh_div", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, PXA1928_CLK_SDH0 * 4, 0x1b, 0x1b, 0x0, 0, &sdh0_lock},
};

Here the mask and enable_val both are set to 0x1b, which means it
shuts off both peripheral and AXI clock both.

Yes, it means you don't get the same savings as you would by turning
off that clock, but that's the choice between using the internal card
detection and a GPIO for this.  The code shouldn't force you to use a
GPIO just because the Linux driver implementation dumbly disables the
AXI clock.


Exactly,

In my case, luckily I have eMMC on board, which keeps AXI clock ON all
the time. Not sure why somebody would keep dependency like this,
inspite having individual control for AXI clock.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to