> > Now I can see why this might have been considered a good idea.
> >A remote host would not be able to reply to a 127 sourced address.
>
> Argh, they broke this too?
No your setup was broken anyway - see RFC792, RFC 1122
> I used to use 127.0.1.0 as a virtual subnet via IP transparent proxy.
> You would connect to 127.0.1.0 and your connection request would be
> turned into a transparent proxy request in user space and forwarded
> somewhere (in this case over an ssh port forwarding tunnel).
Use an RFC1597 space for it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
