Hello!
> Believe me, I'm not having *fun* with 2.2 :-(.
Thank you very much. 8)
> It's a debug level printk. Many people don't log debug messages on
> the grounds they are just using it, not debugging it :-). Besides,
> the message isn't that illuminating until you look at the code.
Exactly, it is debugging message, because the situation is bug.
> Which for looped slip, ppp, ethertap etc. could well be true. In the
> case of diald's proxy packets aregoing out not in anyway.
Only loopback loops back. The rest of the hacks are valuable
only beacuse they are not loopback de jure.
> I don't get it. How can an unprivileged Linux user add addresses
> to interfaces and send out bogus packets anyway?
Not add, but send.
bind(s, 127.0.0.1)
sendto(s, 193.233.7.65)
> necessary in the kernel. If anything it should be *documented*!
It is documented in RFCs. And it is not policy but MUST NOT statement.
Alexey Kuznetsov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
