On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Dennis wrote: > At 06:46 PM 4/24/99 +0000, Vesselin Atanasov wrote: > > >> do they use "experimental kernels". > >IMHO late 2.1.X was stable enough for production use and it had too many > >new features, compared to 2.0.x > > > >vesselin atanasov > > Thats funny...then how come 2.2.0 wasn't stable enough for production? LOL I don't know. You say 2.2.0 isn't stable enough for production, so you prove it. vesselin atanasov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ipchains ??? Alan Cox
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Alan Cox
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Vesselin Atanasov
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Vesselin Atanasov
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Jason Slagle
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Vesselin Atanasov
- Re: ipchains ??? Alan Cox
- Re: ipchains ??? linuxnet
- Re: ipchains ??? Henrik Olsen
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Re: ipchains ??? Dennis
- Use the Source, Luke. Ford Prefect
- Re: Use the Source, Luke. Thomas Good
- Re: Use the Source, Luke. Mark H. Wood
- Re: ipchains ??? yenjet
- Re: ipchains ??? jamal
