> >IMHO late 2.1.X was stable enough for production use and it had too many
> >new features, compared to 2.0.x
> >
> >vesselin atanasov
> 
> Thats funny...then how come 2.2.0 wasn't stable enough for production? LOL

For many people it was - we just set *very* high standards.

 2.1.102 #9 Wed May 20 17:11:45 BST 1998 i486 unknown
 7:02pm  up 211 days, 16:40,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to