On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Hi,
Below is exact message from one of the Win 95 box. I did install the
Redhat 6.0 in SERVER mode and no more setups.
1. The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was
rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subject 'Research Paper for presentation at 7 ICG',
Account: '164.100.242.130', Server: '164.100.242.130', Protocol: SMTP,
Server Response: '550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied',
Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 550, Error Number:
0x800CCC79
2. The connection to the server has failed. Account: '164.100.242.130',
Server: '164.100.242.130', Protocol:
POP3, Port: 110, Secure(SSL):
No, Socket Error: 10061, Error Number: 0x800CCC0E
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:25:27PM +0530, Dr. S.K. Singh wrote: > Hi
>
> Huh???
>
> Secure pop3 (pop3s) is suppose to be on port 995, not port 110.
> Secure imap (imaps) is port 993. Secure smtp no longer exists. These
> are assigned by IANA and it's those ports that Outlook and Netscape are
> suppose to try and contact for receiving SSL encrypted traffic, they
> shouldn't even try the non-encrypted ports (110 for pop3 and 143 for imap)
> if you specified a secure connection. Why it would say "Secure Port 25
> (SSL)/ secure port 110(SSL)", is beyond me. Those port numbers are
> just wrong for SSL.
As i indicated above its newly installed system in Server mode and i just
put IP in /etc/mail/access file and no more setup for SENDMAIL.
> How have you got SSL set up on RedHat 6.0? Are you using edssl,
> stunnel, sslwrapper, sslproxy, some other ssl "wrapper/proxy", or some
> special ssl-enabled server? I use an SSL proxy out of /etc/inetd.conf
> and it works like a charm. It's most definitely NOT and "out of the box"
> server though, and you have to have a server certificate setup with the
> proper names and certification. If you don't have your certificate signed
> by a service like Thawte or Verisign, you have to have your users manually
> accept the certificate the first time they connect in. Outside of that,
> self signed certificates work just fine (and are relatively simple to
> generate).
I did not get this not a computer expert but an Animal Scientist, playing
with computers also.
> Funny thought... I just realized that you never said that you
> wanted to be using SSL encrypted services, only that the client message
> indicated secure services on the non-secure ports. Do you want to be
> using SSL secured connections or did you intend to use unencrypted connections
> in the first place? If you hadn't intended to use SSL, disable the "Secure
> Connection" (I think that's what Netscape calls it) option on the server
> preferences tab.
I never intended to use SSL, Only upgraded my server from Slackware to
Redhat 6.0 and this message appaered.
Thanks
>
> > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> > Dr. S. K. Singh,
> > Agril. Res. Services. Scientist (AG&B) and I/C ARIS Cell,
> > CIRG, Makhdoom, Farah, Mathura
> > 281122, India. Ph. 91-565-7-63334(R)
> > 63246 (Fax), 63325 (O)
> > *_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
>
> Mike
> --
> Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 331-2437 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
> PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
>
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Dr. S. K. Singh,
Agril. Res. Services. Scientist (AG&B) and I/C ARIS Cell,
CIRG, Makhdoom, Farah, Mathura
281122, India. Ph. 91-565-7-63334(R)
63246 (Fax), 63325 (O)
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
