[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes ("Re: [2.3.18ac7] ip_rt_frag_needed"):
> Hello!
>
> > It is possible to bind a socket to a particular network device using
> > SO_BINDTODEVICE.
>
> SO_BINDTODEVICE is _not_ well defined, when it is used with not directly
> reachable destinations.
Okay. The reason why I noticed it was because the of the discrepancy
between ip_rt_frag_needed and ip_rt_redirect. ip_rt_redirect looks up
the hash both with and without the interface number in the hash, which
implies that oif can get set to non-zero for destinations which are
not directly connected. Whether or not the interface number should be
non-zero, surely these two routines should use the same method for
looking up entries in the hash table?
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
