>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 17:41:30 +0100 (CET)
>On Fri, 5 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Seems the most transparent router is named "bridge" ;-)
>It is true, but normally I can't make ip-filtering on
>a layer-2-bridge, isn't it? And by the way, the router
In a case you have its C source it is possible to add any
filtering code you need - providing it is easy enough to
write code which finds the info used by the filtering in
an IP packet (need info on IP packet structure).
The question is: is it easier to disable unwanted features
of router on Linux, or add wanted features to a bridge?
>which I wanted to set up should get a third network-card
>and route some packets to another network.
I used the bridge with two cards only, but I assume it can
work with more cards without a problem. After all, there
is its source, and it is not hard to change definitions.
Jerzy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
