I wouldn't exactly agree with what you just said. Even if the environment
was primarily NT workstations, I would probably still go with Linux. That
is assuming I could figure out how to set it up nicely for NT workstations.
I have never used Linux in an NT workstation environment.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: January 17, 2000 2:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Linux & Samba vs NT
>
>
> Well...you can probably find a test that would show that mac is
> better than
> linux and NT combined....(if you look for it) it isn�t relevant... If your
> enviroment is NT primarly the best choice would be an NT server as a
> fileserver... and if it is mostly linux, samba would be your choice... the
> preformance diff isn�t that big..
>
> /P
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trenton D. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 11:38 PM
> To: Linux-Net
> Subject: Linux & Samba vs NT
>
>
> A while back I heard that NT outperformed Linux in networking in a message
> from this list! The person writing the message even gave a link to a
> Microsoft site that stated this FaCt??? I was very silly, and simply
> trusted microsoft not to be biased. I don't know what I was
> thinking!!! I
> have now found information that states that when tested with Ziff Davis
> NetBench, Linux and Samba outperform NT. Not only that, but as
> we all know,
> Samba integrates into an NT domain seamlessly!
>
>
http://lwn.net/1999/0121/samba.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
