> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bernd Eckenfels
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2000 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ethertap
>
>
> In article <001a01bf7346$2335da20$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Does anybody know what I missed when I was using it as a module ?
>
> If you missed a other module the command "modprobe" instead of "insmod"
> would have solved that problem (if you run depmod -a at boot). If modprobe
> does not work, too... you have probably one of the broken kernel
> versions..
> which symbols are missing?

unfortunately I didn't take note of the symbols and now that my current
kernel has ethertap built into it repeating the error is a bit tricky

>
> On my system (2.2.12) ethertap need no module to run.
>

I'm using 2.2.13
I have the option to build ethertap as a module or to build it into the
kernel.

I thought perhaps that if it were a module it might accept parameters from
insmod indicating the number of devices to support. Otherwise I can't see
why I get tap0 but not tap1
I've created the appropriate dev file so I don't suppose that's the problem

Greg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to