> built on a PC with hard disks, x86 CPU's (x86 would be the most common > used, I'm sure), and off the shelf nic's is not. I'm certain any person > responsible for a large corporate infrastructure would sooner rely on a > product designed to perform routing functions. You've forgotten something important. Commodity pricing An x86 is the wrong hammer, but its such a large cheap hammer that it doesnt matter. Right now you need fancy stuff for Gbit ethernet but for 100Mbit lans a PC is a fine router - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166/4... Brian J. Schrock
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium ... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pent... David Lang
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and ... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 ... David Lang
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pent... kuznet
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium ... John LeMay
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pent... Alan Cox
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pent... Stephen R. van den Berg
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and ... Adam Rheaume
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 ... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco ... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: Performance Tests Ci... Dennis
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco ... Rick Blake
- Re: Performance Tests Ci... Michael Kujawa
- Re: Performance Tests Ci... Stephen Satchell
- Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 ... David Lang
- Network devices drop intermi... Lucio Nino Rossi
