On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Dennis wrote:
> My "point" (which is completely valid) was that its a lot of work and
> expense for nothing. Cobalt, case and point, uses flash for boot and if
> your disk crashes the system is toast. so all you've done is added a lot of
> expense for no gain.
flash is about $1/meg these days; cost is no longer an issue.
You are probably right that there is a lot more work involved with a flash
disk. Depends what your end goal is: If form-factor and power are
important to you then hard-disks are the definetely the wrong way to go.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
