On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> A light comes glimmering through. If your supposition is correct, then
> above.net and ORBS aren't communicating very well. Given your assumption
> that above.net does not want to see 10.1.1.* scanned by ORBS, we would hope
> that above.net would have TOLD ORBS "hey, leave 10.1.1.* alone! But the
> rest of the address space is fair play."
>
> After all, the static space is set by the request of the address owners, if
> I'm reading all the info correctly.
>
> So did above.net say 10.1.1.*, or 10.*.*.*? If the latter, than above.net
> is shooting itself in the foot.
>
> (Nothing personal, I'm just the curious type.)
>
> Satch
To my understanding, above.net and ORBS are not communicating. [go figure]
ORBS claims above.net has requested nothing of them. This means ORBS has
made the decision to block the entire netblocks based on that example
10.1.1.*
-d
-====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====-
to unsubscribe email "unsubscribe linux-admin" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See the linux-admin FAQ: http://www.kalug.lug.net/linux-admin-FAQ/
