GLC wrote:
> > portmap: 192.168.1.50, 192.168.1.51
>
> Would
> portmap: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> be correct for all the subnets
Try it. The only format which I'm certain that works for portmap is an
individual dotted-decimal IP address. But that doesn't mean that the
other formats definititely don't work; I just don't recall anything
else working.
--
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
