On 20 Mar 00, at 17:52, Glynn Clements wrote:
>
> GLC wrote:
> >
> > Would
> > portmap: 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> > be correct for all the subnets
>
> Try it. The only format which I'm certain that works for portmap is an
> individual dotted-decimal IP address. But that doesn't mean that the
> other formats definititely don't work; I just don't recall anything
> else working.
It works. Thanks.
Adrian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
