best documented, maybe so.. up-to-date, think again :)
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Hariharan L Thantry wrote:
> '
>
>
> 2.0.34 is the best documented linux kernel out there...
> the entire core commentary is based on it...and as you yourself admitted,
> probably has no relevance to this discussion..
>
> have a great day.
> hari
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hariharan L. Thantry
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 4642, S. Hagadorn Road, #E6 Dept of Computer Science and Engg
> East Lansing, MI 48823 Michigan State University
> East Lansing, MI 48824-1226
> Ph(res): 1-517-332-2645 Ph(off): 1-517-353-6646
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Statux wrote:
>
> > 2.0.34 is very old.. upgrade! :) Not that it's relevant to this stuff..
> > but 2.4.0 is almost out, ya know :)
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Hariharan L Thantry wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Whenever, the accept() call succeeds, it creates a new sock data structure
> > > which is added to the linked list of existing socks. However, I doubt that
> > > any settings made by setsockopt() for the original socket remain in the
> > > new inherited socket (2.0.34 kernel).
> > >
> > > This is my impression.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Hari
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Statux wrote:
> > >
> > > > > How's the water mark being set? Can you provide
> > > > > any pointer to sites that contains these information.
> > > >
> > > > The water marks are the amount of data in the buffers before data will be
> > > > sent/received, etc.
> > > >
> > > > check out getsockopt
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> > > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
