O.K. I installed the rpm for binutils-2.10.0.18-1 and now,
when I try to install gcc-2.95.1-3, I get these error messages:
[root@localhost rks]# man rpm
[root@localhost rks]# rpm -i --test gcc-2.95.1-3.i386.rpm
file /usr/bin/egcs from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/bin/gcc from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/bin/gcov from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/bin/i386-redhat-linux-gcc from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file
from package egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/bin/protoize from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/bin/unprotoize from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/i386-redhat-linux/lib/libiberty.a from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts
with file from package egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/info/gcc.info.gz from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from
package egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/man/man1/egcs.1 from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from
package egcs-1.1.2-12
file /usr/man/man1/gcc.1 from install of gcc-2.95.1-3 conflicts with file from package
egcs-1.1.2-12
What now? (I do have the tarball for gcc-2.95.2 -- should I try it
instead?)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000806 16:44]:
>
>
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Richard Spencer wrote:
>
> > I located the gcc-2.95.1-3 rpm and tried to install it, but
> > apparently I don't have two packages I need:
> >
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > binutils >= 2.9.5.0.12 is needed by gcc-2.95.1-3
> > cpp = 2.95.1 is needed by gcc-2.95.1-3
> >
> > I got and installed the cpp-2.95.1-3 rpm, but got the following
> > error when I tried to install binutils-2.9.5.0.27-2.i386.rpm:
> >
> > unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/ldscripts: cpio:
> > unlink failed - Is a directory
> >
> > What on earth does this mean?
> >
> That looks like a malformed rpm. It is trying to put a file where there
> is a directory. In a normal binutils package, ldscripts is a directory
> with a bunch of files describing how ld is to behave on various
> architechtures and flavors thereof.
>
> Script started on Sun Aug 6 15:10:03 2000
> witsend:/dosd/tar$ ls
> binutils-2.10.0.12-1.i386.rpm
> witsend:/dosd/tar$ rpm -qlip *|grep ldscripts
> /usr/lib/ldscripts
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.x
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.xbn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.xn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.xr
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.xs
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.xu
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386linux.x
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386linux.xbn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386linux.xn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386linux.xr
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386linux.xu
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.x
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xbn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xn
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xr
> /usr/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xu
> witsend:/dosd/tar$ exit
> exit
>
> Script done on Sun Aug 6 15:10:34 2000
>
> When as choked on a construct wine used, I figured my as was dragging
> and I needed a new binutils. H. J. Lu releases a new development
> version to linux-gcc from time to time, so I just went and got one.
>
> ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/binutils/binutils-2.10.0.12-1.i386.rpm
>
> I think the current one is -2.10.0.18, so 0.12 may be gone. I have had
> no problems with it.
>
> Lawson
>
>
> This message is brought to you by Wine-20000801, with the unwitting
> cooperation of Juno 1.49.
> ---cut here
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
---cut here---
--
Richard Spencer "Why Not" is a slogan
São Paulo, Brazil for an interesting life.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mason Cooley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
