> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:16 PM > To: Gadiyar, Anand > Cc: Eduardo Valentin; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Eduardo Valentin > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] OMAP3xx: Add DMA and IRQ definition > for McBSP 1 and 2 > > * Gadiyar, Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080424 22:12]: > > <snip> > > > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h > > > b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h > > > index be0431e..270e158 100644 > > > --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h > > > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/dma.h > > > @@ -273,6 +273,10 @@ > > > #define OMAP24XX_DMA_MS 63 /* S_DMA_62 */ > > > #define OMAP242X_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ5 64 /* S_DMA_63 */ > > > #define OMAP243X_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ6 64 /* S_DMA_63 */ > > > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP1_TX 31 /* S_DMA_30 */ > > > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP1_RX 32 /* S_DMA_31 */ > > > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP2_TX 33 /* S_DMA_32 */ > > > +#define OMAP34XX_DMA_MCBSP2_RX 34 /* S_DMA_33 */ > > > #define OMAP34XX_DMA_EXT_DMAREQ3 64 /* S_DMA_63 */ > > > #define OMAP34XX_DMA_AES2_TX 65 /* S_DMA_64 */ > > > #define OMAP34XX_DMA_AES2_RX 66 /* S_DMA_65 */ > > > > What's the point of this patch? Can't you use OMAP24XX_DMA_MCBSP* names? > > > > > diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h > > > b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h > > > index 15446fd..4e185a8 100644 > > > --- a/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h > > > +++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h > > > @@ -316,7 +316,11 @@ > > > #define INT_34XX_USIM_IRQ 35 > > > #define INT_34XX_WDT3_IRQ 36 > > > #define INT_34XX_SPI4_IRQ 48 > > > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_TX 59 > > > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_RX 60 > > > #define INT_34XX_I2C3_IRQ 61 > > > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_TX 62 > > > +#define INT_34XX_MCBSP2_IRQ_RX 63 > > > #define INT_34XX_PBIAS_IRQ 75 > > > #define INT_34XX_OHCI_IRQ 76 > > > #define INT_34XX_EHCI_IRQ 77 > > > > Ditto with the IRQ lines? > > > > @Tony, > > It would be nice to give people some time to take a look at > the patches before they get pushed. > > Sorry, it seemed like a safe patch to push. I will revert it > today.
I'm sorry I snapped at you guys earlier - it's just that this DMA code was some of my earliest work in the community and I'm a little passionate about it. This particular request line cleanup went through several iterations and I thought I'd done it reasonably well. Regards, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
