On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:02 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > > > > > Note that the twl4030 regulator patch referred to will need a > > > minor patch to work with the -next tree, because of interface > > > change in the regulator framework. > > > > > > drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c | 62 > > > +++++++++++--------------------- > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > > > Applied. > > .... and here's that "minor patch". > > ====== CUT HERE > From: David Brownell <dbrown...@users.sourceforge.net> > > Catch up the twl4030 regulator driver to the regulator > interface change adding another parameter. Also, fix > some comments, and take this opportunity to shrink the > associated per-regulator memory usage by a word. > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrown...@users.sourceforge.net> > --- > drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s) here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest for-next. Thanks Liam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
