On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:39 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 27 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s) > > here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest > > for-next. > > The regulator -next tree seems to be missing a bunch of stuff... > I generated this patch against a "twl4030-regulator.c" which I > extracted *from that tree* yesterday. But today it's different. > > In this case, the current code doesn't have the $SUBJECT patch, > which at that time you had applied. But it does have a small > snippet from that "minor patch"... > > > Color me confused. Are you asking for a "v3" of $SUBJECT, or > is the "v2" going to re-appear? Applied the "v2". > And when will that -next tree > acquire the rest of > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123567791402469&w=2 > Applied and re-based this one into original patch. Thanks Liam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
