On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Ok, the existing field is being replaced by something? I didn't get that > > No, not replaced. I'm adding the support for generic PHY to the existing > USB PHY support. I thought that was clear from the changelog. > > > from the patch description; I thought the new name in this patch was > > going to be it. In that case, a temporary name of usb_phy for the > > existing field, or adding the new field as gen_phy sound reasonable. > > OK, I'll respin the patch #2 with 'gen_phy' and remove the patch #1.
What is the reason for all of this? That is, can you explain the difference between USB PHY support and general PHY support, and why we need both? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
