On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> What do you think about the following patch? Although I agree that if > we can use IRQ_TYPE_NONE as you propose then tht is a much better and > efficient solution that this patch. Let's try IRQ_TYPE_NONE first and if that fails we go back to this. I've pushed the current patch to linux-next. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
