On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't > > cause regressions. > > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc. > > > > For example, this will be used to move some of > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they > > are correct pre- and post-patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues > (below). I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below) > for v3.20.
... and, the patch doesn't even boot. Dropped. If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped. Otherwise you're just wasting my time. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
