Hi, On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures > > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify > > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't > > > cause regressions. > > > > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the > > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc. > > > > > > For example, this will be used to move some of > > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they > > > are correct pre- and post-patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > > > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues > > (below). I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below) > > for v3.20. > > ... and, the patch doesn't even boot. Dropped. > > If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that > boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped. > Otherwise you're just wasting my time.
you're using a really old version, though. There have been other versions which are still under discussion. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
