* Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> [100115 23:46]:
> Thanks for the nice cleanup.

Thanks for testing :)

> <snip>
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ struct omap_globals {
> >     void __iomem    *prm;           /* Power and Reset Management */
> >     void __iomem    *cm;            /* Clock Management */
> >     void __iomem    *cm2;
> > +   unsigned long   uart1_phys;
> > +   unsigned long   uart2_phys;
> > +   unsigned long   uart3_phys;
> > +   unsigned long   uart4_phys;
> Considering they are register base address, can
> these be declared as "void __iomem" instead of "unsigned long"

These are physical addresses instead of virtual addresses.
They get ioremapped in mach-omap[12]/serial.c. So they should
not be void __iomem * in omap_globals.

BTW, we should eventually change everything in omap_globals
to be physical addresses.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to