On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando <x0095...@ti.com> wrote: > From db3d76a2e89a1c227322a2732ddf7ebf5cd4b4cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ernesto Ramos <erne...@ti.com> > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:12:05 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH] DSPBRIDGE: MMU-Fault debugging enhancements > > These changes allow for DSP task information to be printed > by the MPU dspbridge when DSP MMU fault ocurrs. > > Signed-off-by: Cris Jansson <cjans...@ti.com> > [change to open source coding style] > Signed-off-by: Ernesto Ramos <erne...@ti.com>
This patch seems to be doing a lot of things. Couldn't it have been split? Also, from the commit message it seems to implement a new feature, however, I heard it's supposed to fix memory corruption too. Is that true? If that's the case the code that fixes that would have to be separate. I understand this patch was already pushed to dspbridge branch, but I think such important changes should be properly recorded in the history. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
