On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Hiroshi DOYU <hiroshi.d...@nokia.com> wrote: > From: "ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.l...@ti.com> >> I think the best thing to do here is remove the spinlock, if not, >> you are preventing that omap_mbox_msg_send be executed from a >> tasklet or isr context. That maybe in this moment it is not called >> but it could be needed in the future. The caller of >> omap_mbox_msg_send should be take care of that function can not be >> call simultaneously. > > What about adding another function, omap_mbox_msg_send_sync()?
That's exactly what I was thinking about when I heard the problem. Would this function send all the msgs already queued, and then wait for the current one actually be sent? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
