Silesh C V <sailes...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Govindraj <govindraj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Silesh C V <sil...@ti.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman
>>> <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
>>>> Silesh C V <sil...@ti.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Fix conditional compilation.
>>>>
>>>> What excatly was the compile error?  and with which compiler?
>>>
>>> There is no compiler error.But what we need after an #elif is a
>>> conditional expression.
>>> The correct usage is #elif defined(CONFIG_XXX) rather than #elif CONFIG_XXX.
>>>
>>> Further, if the kernel is configured for a non-omap3 arch (eg.OMAP4),
>>> you get a compiler warning:
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c:47:7: warning: "CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3" is not 
>>> defined
>>> which goes away with this patch.
>>>
>>
>> Silesh,
>>
>> which defconfig are you using with multi omap-build 
>> defconfig(omap3_defconfig)
>>
>> CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 will be enabled. So this compilation error will not occur.
>>
>> ---
>> Regards,
>> Govindraj.R
>>
>>
>
> As I said before there is no compilation error. But what we have to
> check for is whether CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 is defined or not.
> Not for the value of CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3. We have to check for value of
> defined (CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3). Otherwise compiler searches for the value
> of the macro and hence the warning(comes with a omap4 config).See how
> #elif + CONFIG_XXX is used elsewhere in kernel.

I see what you're saying now.  The current #elif clause will *always* be
true.

You'll notice that all of this confusion would not have happened if the
original changelog described the problem in detail, showing that that
#elif clause will always be true, and especially not calling it a
compliation fix.

Please re-post with a better changelog and I will incoporate into the
pm-cpufreq sub-branch of the PM branch.

Thanks,

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to