On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
> I see what you're saying now. The current #elif clause will *always* be > true. > > You'll notice that all of this confusion would not have happened if the > original changelog described the problem in detail, showing that that > #elif clause will always be true, and especially not calling it a > compliation fix. I did not call it a compilation fix, I called it a _conditional_ compilation fix ;-). The problem is not that the #elif clause ends up always being true. The problem is that the preprocessor checks for the value of CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 rather than the value of defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3). Hence it emits warnings when CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 is not defined making the #elif clause useless(which is there to check whether the macro is defined or not). > > Please re-post with a better changelog and I will incoporate into the > pm-cpufreq sub-branch of the PM branch. Will do. Thanks, Silesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
