On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:06:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > This is work in progress. > > > > We have two SoCs using SRAM, both with their own allocation systems, > > and both with their own ways of copying functions into the SRAM. > I havn't checked the details, but maybe the code in > arch/arm/plat-mxc/iram_alloc.c could be migrated to your approach, too?
Its already in there now that I have replies from Nguyen Dinh. It looks like this presently: arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h | 24 +++++++-- arch/arm/plat-mxc/iram_alloc.c | 50 +++++--------------- and if we get rid of the iram_alloc/iram_free wrappers around the sram_pool (now pv_pool) alloc/free in iram.h, in the same way I've done for Davinci, then we get less new additions too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
